Tavik reads the visit as the doctor speaks and checks it against the CMS policy that governs each code — closing documentation gaps before the claim ever leaves your clinic.
One visit, seven roles. The doctor speaks; the rules decide what the payer will ask for; a claim is built, scrubbed and gated; and if it is denied, the appeal argues from the record or refuses to be written. Watch it run on a real case →
Ambient speech with no speaker labels and no codes spoken. A model reads the encounter into facts — which joint, which side, whose treatment, done today or booked — and every fact is dropped unless it can be quoted from the transcript.
No model names a code. Deterministic rules map the facts to CPT and ICD, then pull that code's coverage criteria from the CMS article or NCD that governs it — quoted, cited and checked against the source.
A gap is a question, not a verdict. It appears when the visit reaches the thing that risks the denial and disappears the moment the doctor says the missing sentence — mid-dictation, while it is still cheap to answer.
CMS-certain findings come from deterministic data — NCCI, MUE, the ICD tabular, the LCD — and they block submission. Model findings advise and say so. A guess never stops a claim, and a fact never gets downgraded to a guess.
Asked to appeal a denial on a thin record, the generator withholds the letter instead of inventing support for it, and grades its own draft against what the payer requires before you file.
Each lesson names the mistake, the correction and the authority behind it, verified against the NCCI, PFS or ICD tables before it is ever shown to a doctor — and it closes itself once the note answers it.